1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Lifespan of 3.4 Liter versus 2.7, and real world experiences?

Discussion in '1st Gen. Tacomas (1995-2004)' started by kayakingguy, Feb 25, 2015.

  1. Feb 25, 2015 at 3:04 PM
    #1
    kayakingguy

    kayakingguy [OP] Ask about my custom truck detailing!

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Member:
    #45393
    Messages:
    258
    Gender:
    Male
    OutsidaTampa
    Debating buying a 2.7liter manual 4X4 or a 3.4 liter V6... is there any difference in lifespan on average for the 4 versus 6 cylinder?

    Anybody have any real world experience driving both, MPG etc...?
     
  2. Feb 25, 2015 at 3:20 PM
    #2
    LocknLoad

    LocknLoad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2014
    Member:
    #137109
    Messages:
    203
    Gender:
    Male
    near the Cherohala Skyway, TN
    Vehicle:
    2015 DC Off-Road 4x4
    My experience shopping both - is this - 2.7 gets a little better MPG, 3.4 a little more power. 2.7 has a timing chain, 3.4 has a timing belt that will need to be replaced.

    Longevity of either is very good. Like any engine, if its been cared for, you'll get a long trouble free life from either. Lots of owners on TW have 200K and more miles - search and you'll find a number of posts.
     
  3. Feb 25, 2015 at 3:25 PM
    #3
    2stroketrush

    2stroketrush Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Member:
    #72157
    Messages:
    1,162
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tyler Addison Rush
    Baltimore
    Vehicle:
    Built 97 ExtraCab
    Overland Purpose Built 97 going on 190K.
    I have a 2.7 with 180k, my brother has 3.4 with 200k, my dad has 3.4 with 140k and none have had any problems to speak of, Would I buy another 2.7? No only because Now that I have added weight in armor and big tires my truck is a slug. Re-gearing is a option, but my I have seen 3.4's set up with no loss of power compared to mine. Also have a 87 4runner with 250k on a 22-RE:D
     
  4. Feb 25, 2015 at 4:25 PM
    #4
    se7enine

    se7enine MCMLXXIX

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2013
    Member:
    #102322
    Messages:
    23,429
    Gender:
    Male
    Reno, NV
    Vehicle:
    07 Lexus GX470, 84 4Runner 3RZ, 85 MR2
    I too have a 2.7 and have taken it over 200k miles. All my 22re's were over 200k miles and my wifes corolla has over 200k miles. Regular maintenance is key though. Only the 3.0 V6 was a problem for trucks and 4runners. If given the choice I would go 3.4 for the extra power. Depending on what you use it for the 2.7 is acceptable, and easier to work on.
     
  5. Feb 25, 2015 at 5:13 PM
    #5
    mtucker

    mtucker Tacoma addict

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Member:
    #20610
    Messages:
    352
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    Escondido, CA.
    Vehicle:
    03 Prerunner DC
    Replaced chrome badges with Sockmonkey black badges, painted billet grill black, K&N cold air intake, my corner light turn signal circuit, Speedfreek traction bars, RAAMaudio BXT/Ensolite, Stereo: Kenwood KIV-701 USB/Bluetooth deck, 10" Pioneer shallow sub behind the rear seat, Infinity 6822cf 6x8 front and rear doors, Fosgate P400-2 (sub), US Acoustics USX-4065 (four main speakers)
    When I was looking at buying a used 1st gen Tacoma in 2010, I asked a mechanic friend (older guy like me that has decades of experience) about the 3.4L V6 in the Tacoma. He said it was a good engine and had been out there (in the Tacoma, T100, and 4Runner) since the mid 90s (so 15 years in the field) and the most common non-trivial items were water pump and timing belt. Sure enough, my water pump started leaking around 85K miles so I had the timing belt done at the same time. Now I'm at 145K and the only thing I have done besides spark plugs, wires, and oil changes was to replace the mass air flow (MAF) sensor. It sounds like the 2.7L is a champ also, but the extra horse power is nice.... especially if you run the AC a lot and have hills around. I love my AC.
    Matt
     
  6. Feb 25, 2015 at 5:18 PM
    #6
    gray223

    gray223 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2013
    Member:
    #116062
    Messages:
    3,439
    Gender:
    Male
    SE Missouri
    Vehicle:
    2014 Tundra Limited
    I would get the v6. I have a single cab auto 4x4 with the 2.7. Doesn't get any better gas milage than the v6 based on fulley and reports on tw. I also have a ultaguage and watch my mpg constantly. It also lacks in power I think, with the auto anyway.
     
  7. Feb 25, 2015 at 6:47 PM
    #7
    kayakingguy

    kayakingguy [OP] Ask about my custom truck detailing!

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Member:
    #45393
    Messages:
    258
    Gender:
    Male
    OutsidaTampa
    Interesting... it's a shame Toyota still doesn't make Gen1's... :) I just have never liked the look or feel of the Gen2 having owned one also... I'm sure that's an argument starter though so I'll politely back away from that discussion. :)
     
  8. Feb 25, 2015 at 6:50 PM
    #8
    NOLA ItsNotOva

    NOLA ItsNotOva Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2013
    Member:
    #105503
    Messages:
    1,113
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brandon
    New Orleans, LA
    Vehicle:
    2011 DCSB TX TRD
    Get the 3.4. Especially if you're going to add weight. Personally, I'm still on the original timing belt. And if it does break, just got to get another one. Won't harm the engine.
     
  9. Feb 25, 2015 at 6:52 PM
    #9
    smokn

    smokn Unsenior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2015
    Member:
    #149385
    Messages:
    146
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    08 DCSB TRD SPORT SR5 4x4
    I burned through most of the internet debating this until I finally made my purchase a couple weeks ago. My wife has the 3.4 auto in her T4R and it seemed acceptable but not overkill on power. I knew the 2.7 would be ok, but I didn't want to drop that much towing capacity coming from a 03 Silverado w/ a 5.3. I ended up with a 3.4 5spd and I don't regret it.

    To each his own, but I'll spend a few MPG for the reserve power and stronger tranny...not to mention I think there are marginally more write-ups/mods floating around the internet for the 3.4. Please correct me if I'm wrong in this assumption. A stout knowledge base is invaluable.
     
  10. Feb 25, 2015 at 6:53 PM
    #10
    NOLA ItsNotOva

    NOLA ItsNotOva Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2013
    Member:
    #105503
    Messages:
    1,113
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brandon
    New Orleans, LA
    Vehicle:
    2011 DCSB TX TRD
    You sir are correct. Looks easier to work on as opposed to the 4 banger
     
  11. Feb 25, 2015 at 6:54 PM
    #11
    CelsisTaco

    CelsisTaco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Member:
    #108805
    Messages:
    995
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Anthony
    Des Monies, IA
    Vehicle:
    2011 DCSB
    2 inch lift. LED fog lights (Cali fab) Alpine head unit. Kicker door speakers. Skar subwoofer.
    Never have drove a 3.4, but i can say this-the 2.7 motor is supper dependable. I think its the perfect amount of power to swing some big tires, and still not get stuck. My 2.7 has enough power for me and i think it's a perfect DD. If your looking for power and reliability the 3.4 would be good choice, the 2.7 is just better on gas-and still has enough power (for me anyways!)
     
    ToyotaJim likes this.
  12. Feb 25, 2015 at 7:46 PM
    #12
    kayakingguy

    kayakingguy [OP] Ask about my custom truck detailing!

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Member:
    #45393
    Messages:
    258
    Gender:
    Male
    OutsidaTampa
    I had a 2.7 liter 96 manual 4wd before with some 31's on it and it drove wonderfully... I'm not going to be racing, all I care about is highway MPG or that it can pull a tree down in 4wd low. :)
     
  13. Feb 25, 2015 at 7:51 PM
    #13
    Tacoma Dave

    Tacoma Dave Long time lurker

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Member:
    #118646
    Messages:
    139
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    David
    Oakley, CA
    Vehicle:
    04 xtra cab trd
    2004 trd off road 4X4, 265 75 r16 bfg at, bilstein 5100 all around front at 1in, rear firestone ride rite air bags
    Look up million mile t100. It was a 95 that has the 3.4l and has 1 million miles sounds good to me.
     
  14. Feb 26, 2015 at 1:53 AM
    #14
    Snowy

    Snowy Is neither here nor there

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Member:
    #122349
    Messages:
    3,455
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Connor
    Winnebago, IL
    Vehicle:
    3 linked 98 Xtra cab
    Stock-ish
    I've owned a 300k 3.4 and own a 300k 2.7 now. Both have been flawless, I really do miss the power of the v6 though. 37" PBR's are a heavy ass tire for the 4 banger to lug around
     
  15. Feb 26, 2015 at 3:32 AM
    #15
    vern650

    vern650 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Member:
    #111738
    Messages:
    837
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    brandon
    hyrum, ut
    Vehicle:
    '97 4x4 taco xtra cab 3rz/5spd
    HBS leveling kit, 31x10.50 mudders, header/imco exhaust, rear billies, LR ucas, home brewed onboard air, cb radio
    I got a 97 taco with the 2.7 and 5spd pushin 300k and my buddies got a 98 4rnr with the 3.4 and auto pushin 300k. They both still run like champs, my taco came from a farm and has lead a rough life and it shows and the 4rnr looks to have lead a much happier life. Granted there's gonna be advantages and disadvantages between the two like manual vs. Auto and weight but performance wise they're pretty close, almost neck and neck in a drag race. Other than the extra 40hp in the 3.4, which is not all that much, there's not many benefits to the 3.4 over the 2.7. Simplicity and durability probably both go to the 2.7, just look up 3rz videos on YouTube and see the kinda power they're getting out of the little 4 banger in drag cars. Don't see many 3.4s layin down those kinda numbers. Also at least in my neck of the woods 3.4 engines sell pretty much a dime a dozen where the 3rzs are goin for a premium, that oughta say somethin.
     
  16. Feb 26, 2015 at 3:45 AM
    #16
    kayakingguy

    kayakingguy [OP] Ask about my custom truck detailing!

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Member:
    #45393
    Messages:
    258
    Gender:
    Male
    OutsidaTampa
    If the worst should happen down the road, could you fit a 3.4 engine into a 2.7 truck as a replacement without too much fitting? I want to keep this truck forever so it may need another engine at some point, 3.4's are easier to find it sounds like as a replacement.

    I had a 96 2.7 and it worked great for me personally in the past. It was a farm truck with a welded pipe back bumper etc...
     
  17. Feb 26, 2015 at 5:01 AM
    #17
    Andy.G

    Andy.G Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2014
    Member:
    #121972
    Messages:
    1,330
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Andy
    Virginia
    Vehicle:
    96 tacoma sx 4x4 2.7 5 speed
    Started automatic. Swapped to manual
    I have a 2.7 reg cab with 301,000. (5 sp). Had auto trans that I was not fond of in comparison to 5 sp. I am still on original timing chain and clutch. If u r gonna tow I would go 6 cyl. I got this with 6 miles. I have hauled boats,trailers. 4 cyl. will do it but not so happily. U just have to decide what kind of options u need. I will never part from this motor. Awesome low end power also. Either way u won't be going wrong!!
     
  18. Feb 26, 2015 at 10:21 AM
    #18
    vern650

    vern650 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Member:
    #111738
    Messages:
    837
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    brandon
    hyrum, ut
    Vehicle:
    '97 4x4 taco xtra cab 3rz/5spd
    HBS leveling kit, 31x10.50 mudders, header/imco exhaust, rear billies, LR ucas, home brewed onboard air, cb radio
    I'm sure you can, it just takes time/money
     
  19. Feb 28, 2015 at 3:11 PM
    #19
    kayakingguy

    kayakingguy [OP] Ask about my custom truck detailing!

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Member:
    #45393
    Messages:
    258
    Gender:
    Male
    OutsidaTampa
    Funny how that money tool trumps everything else in the toolbox sometimes, even though it's a hard pill to swallow; the thought of getting someone else to work on your stuff...

    Sounds like when it comes to tranny work you need both time and money, and to save a few bucks you need VAST amounts of time to trade... Or your own shop (again time and money) :)
     

Products Discussed in

To Top