1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

GMRS antennas

Discussion in '3rd Gen. Tacomas (2016-2023)' started by Blueberry.Taco, Feb 14, 2021.

  1. Feb 14, 2021 at 8:46 AM
    #1
    Blueberry.Taco

    Blueberry.Taco [OP] blueberry.taco (IG)

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Member:
    #340806
    Messages:
    865
    First Name:
    Ryo
    SE MI
    Vehicle:
    LT, triple locked, 35s, custom aluminum utility bed with FWC
    some welding required
    After years of dealing with CB, I'm taking a step to switch to GMRS for the new rig.
    I'm eyeing the Midland MXT400 mainly for the high wattage, but unsure of the best antenna solution for my application.

    As I will have a slide in camper (similar setup pictured below) that will cover the roof of my access cab, I would assume a typical roof mount is not going to work.

    and since I plan on taking the camper on and off, mounting the antenna to the camper is not a great solution either.

    I do have a steel front bumper with a tall hoop that I can easily attach an antenna to, but I don't have a great understanding of ground planes for UHF, and then I am reading about antennas that don't require ground planes at all?

    would the Ghost MXTA25 3dB gain antenna that comes in the bundle package be a good choice for a front bumper mount in my application?
    Looking for opinions on best location and antenna option for me.

    (I prefer to avoid ditch light bracket style mounting due to the amount of trees/branches that I go through wheeling in the midwest)

    thanks


    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2021
    NorrinRadd and SJBrown like this.
  2. Feb 14, 2021 at 10:08 AM
    #2
    Blueberry.Taco

    Blueberry.Taco [OP] blueberry.taco (IG)

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Member:
    #340806
    Messages:
    865
    First Name:
    Ryo
    SE MI
    Vehicle:
    LT, triple locked, 35s, custom aluminum utility bed with FWC
    some welding required
    Doing some more reading: looks like if I am sticking to this front bumper mount, I definitely want a 1/2 wavelength no counterpoise needing antenna that is for a frequency range of 462-467 MHz.

    from this one source, it seems these 2 antennas fit the requirements I have come up with so far
    Browning BR-136
    Browning BR-137
    although i admit I can't figure out why I would choose one or the other.

    back to googling...
     
    SR-71A and SJBrown like this.
  3. Feb 14, 2021 at 10:12 AM
    #3
    GrundleJuice

    GrundleJuice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2015
    Member:
    #150931
    Messages:
    2,346
    Gender:
    Male
    Michigan
    Vehicle:
    2016 TRD Bro
    [S]Un-Molested[/S] Lightly Molested
    Thanks for the self reply with info. I started looking into this exact topic a few months ago and then it went to low priority when my truck was totaled. I did a bunch of reading on a radio forum and there was some good info there. I'll see if I can find it again...
     
    Dirk Diggler likes this.
  4. Feb 14, 2021 at 10:56 AM
    #4
    Doc62

    Doc62 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2020
    Member:
    #346138
    Messages:
    612
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dave
    SE Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    2021 Tacoma TRD Off Road, 2019 Sahara
    Personally I would go with one of the mono band 450-470 1/2 wave antennas they offer. I actually used trunk lip mounts on my hood for my antennas.
     
    Gunshot-6A likes this.
  5. Feb 14, 2021 at 11:01 AM
    #5
    Blueberry.Taco

    Blueberry.Taco [OP] blueberry.taco (IG)

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Member:
    #340806
    Messages:
    865
    First Name:
    Ryo
    SE MI
    Vehicle:
    LT, triple locked, 35s, custom aluminum utility bed with FWC
    some welding required
    that brings up a question: are ALL 1/2 wave antennas NGP?
     
  6. Feb 14, 2021 at 11:39 AM
    #6
    NorrinRadd

    NorrinRadd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2020
    Member:
    #317188
    Messages:
    1,180
    Gender:
    Male
    WA
    Vehicle:
    2019 Sport, access cab, MT, Eibach 2.0 stage 2, tow, silver.
    I was looking at the MXT400 also, in case I get stuck up in the mountains with no cell tower in range. I emailed them and they said it was made in China. Would rather have an American made unit, does anyone know of any that are 40-50 watts? If high power is all that matters then here is a 50 watt unit https://www.amazon.com/BTECH-GMRS-50X1-Repeater-136-174-99MHz-400-520-99MHz/dp/B07RDM9LMM but heard something bad about the company so not sure...
     
  7. Feb 14, 2021 at 12:17 PM
    #7
    Doc62

    Doc62 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2020
    Member:
    #346138
    Messages:
    612
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dave
    SE Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    2021 Tacoma TRD Off Road, 2019 Sahara
    If they are true half wave they are. We used to install them on Type 2 van ambulances that had raised fiberglass roofs.
     
    SR-71A likes this.
  8. Feb 14, 2021 at 12:32 PM
    #8
    Blueberry.Taco

    Blueberry.Taco [OP] blueberry.taco (IG)

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Member:
    #340806
    Messages:
    865
    First Name:
    Ryo
    SE MI
    Vehicle:
    LT, triple locked, 35s, custom aluminum utility bed with FWC
    some welding required
    aside from just believing the manufacturer when they say "half wave" antenna, what do you mean by "true" half wave?
     
  9. Feb 14, 2021 at 12:36 PM
    #9
    Doc62

    Doc62 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2020
    Member:
    #346138
    Messages:
    612
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dave
    SE Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    2021 Tacoma TRD Off Road, 2019 Sahara
    A real electrically tuned half wave. Some of the cheap junk says one thing, but when tested show something else.
     
  10. Feb 14, 2021 at 12:37 PM
    #10
    Blueberry.Taco

    Blueberry.Taco [OP] blueberry.taco (IG)

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Member:
    #340806
    Messages:
    865
    First Name:
    Ryo
    SE MI
    Vehicle:
    LT, triple locked, 35s, custom aluminum utility bed with FWC
    some welding required
    I've read bad reliability reviews on the btech one, so I'm not looking at that.
    I did come across this one today that I hadn't heard of in the past.
    Wouxun KG-1000G which seems to pack way more capability/features over the MXT400.
    Not sure I've come across any US made ones if the Midland one is imported too
     
    SJBrown likes this.
  11. Feb 14, 2021 at 12:38 PM
    #11
    Blueberry.Taco

    Blueberry.Taco [OP] blueberry.taco (IG)

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Member:
    #340806
    Messages:
    865
    First Name:
    Ryo
    SE MI
    Vehicle:
    LT, triple locked, 35s, custom aluminum utility bed with FWC
    some welding required
    I guess the best thing I can do is just go with a name brand antenna manufacturer?
     
  12. Feb 14, 2021 at 12:49 PM
    #12
    Doc62

    Doc62 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2020
    Member:
    #346138
    Messages:
    612
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dave
    SE Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    2021 Tacoma TRD Off Road, 2019 Sahara
    Yes. Also for radios, it's hard to find an American made radio. My ham radios are made in Japan. The one thing to look for is a heterodyne receiver vice direct conversion. The Chinese radios have a tendency to be desensitized in a heavy RF environment.
     
  13. Feb 14, 2021 at 12:54 PM
    #13
    SJBrown

    SJBrown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2020
    Member:
    #338549
    Messages:
    157
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2019 Bearded SR AC 4x4
    I'm not a radio hobby guy. More features doesn't tempt me as much as ease of use. The mxt400 seems like what I might go with. Fewer buttons on the mic is a bonus for me! Hahaha It's still repeater capable, privacy tones, frs compatible, built in speaker... I might pair it with some less expensive hand held units and it's good for the kind of hunting I do most.
     
  14. Feb 14, 2021 at 12:58 PM
    #14
    JdevTac

    JdevTac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Member:
    #70234
    Messages:
    6,260
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Josh
    GA/WA
    Vehicle:
    2nd gen
    Go over to arcantenna or similar retailer and search for antennas by frequency. I typically like to stick with Laird, Larsen, Pctel and don’t usually like to opt for a cheap browning or tram.

    ive run a maxrad (I think now part of Pctel) antenna with my MXT400 but now have a Larsen lp450 on my roof as I park in a lot of garages.

    edit: I know you said no hood mount but you should be able to find an antenna wavelength short enough to be shorter than your camper. And your hood at least affords you a legit ground plane compared to say near the tail light or something. Like said above with a 1/2 wave antenna it doesn’t really matter.
     
    Doc62 likes this.
  15. Feb 14, 2021 at 1:00 PM
    #15
    Blueberry.Taco

    Blueberry.Taco [OP] blueberry.taco (IG)

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Member:
    #340806
    Messages:
    865
    First Name:
    Ryo
    SE MI
    Vehicle:
    LT, triple locked, 35s, custom aluminum utility bed with FWC
    some welding required
    I am still learning things so I'm just regurgitating what I've read on the internet so don't blame me if I'm wrong, but there are limitations for repeater usage the MXT400 comes with due to being able to only do single tones? or something along those lines.
    the MXT400 also cannot receive NOAA weather channels is what I'm seeing.

    I'm doing more research on the Wouxung KG-1000G and so far it seems to be a better radio (too new to have reviews on robustness yet)
     
    SJBrown[QUOTED] likes this.
  16. Feb 14, 2021 at 1:07 PM
    #16
    Blueberry.Taco

    Blueberry.Taco [OP] blueberry.taco (IG)

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Member:
    #340806
    Messages:
    865
    First Name:
    Ryo
    SE MI
    Vehicle:
    LT, triple locked, 35s, custom aluminum utility bed with FWC
    some welding required
    NorrinRadd likes this.
  17. Feb 14, 2021 at 1:50 PM
    #17
    Blueberry.Taco

    Blueberry.Taco [OP] blueberry.taco (IG)

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Member:
    #340806
    Messages:
    865
    First Name:
    Ryo
    SE MI
    Vehicle:
    LT, triple locked, 35s, custom aluminum utility bed with FWC
    some welding required
    I just ran to arcantenna and filtered through the no ground plane needed, NMO mount options in the GMRS frequencies and ended up with the following:

    Whip, 15", 2.4dB gain:
    BB4502N 12.5 Inch UHF Whip Antenna with Black NMO Base - 450-470 MHz <datasheet>

    Whip, 32", 5dBi gain:
    BB4505CNS 32 inch Black Base Coil Antenna - NMO Spring - 450-470 MHz NGP <datasheet>
    BB4505CN 32 inch Black Half Wave Antenna - NMO - 450-470 MHz UHF - No Ground Plane

    Phantom, 3.5", "outperforms 3dB gain whips":
    TRAB4500N | Phantom Omni Antenna- 450-470 MHz - NMO - No Ground Plane Reqd

    Base loaded 5/8 wave over 1/2 wave(what does that mean?) 5dB/3dB gain:
    MUF4505NGP: PCTEL / Maxrad Base Loaded Chrome Coil Rugged 450-470 MHz - No Ground Plane Required <datasheet>

    Please help me understand what the differences are and why I would or wouldn't want one or the another.
     
    SigBoy likes this.
  18. Feb 14, 2021 at 2:03 PM
    #18
    JdevTac

    JdevTac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Member:
    #70234
    Messages:
    6,260
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Josh
    GA/WA
    Vehicle:
    2nd gen
    For a whip I recommend running an antenna with a spring.

    I probably would pick a whip over one of the puck/tube style like the phantom. Those seem to sacrifice performance for lower profile. And given you arent mounting to your roof you should be able to run a whip.

    Gain is sort of personal preference. You can do a Google search on gain and antennas and see why high gain isn’t ways desirable and there are pros and cons to gain specs. Here is one example blog post here:
    https://www.daywireless.com/blog/2019/03/30/to-gain-or-not-to-gainthat-is-the-antenna-question/

    most of my antennas have a little bit of gain around 2 to 3 just because of the other specs I wanted, the antennas I have happened to fall in that range.
     
    SR-71A likes this.
  19. Feb 16, 2021 at 10:36 AM
    #19
    Blueberry.Taco

    Blueberry.Taco [OP] blueberry.taco (IG)

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Member:
    #340806
    Messages:
    865
    First Name:
    Ryo
    SE MI
    Vehicle:
    LT, triple locked, 35s, custom aluminum utility bed with FWC
    some welding required
    do pretty much all GMRS radios use the Pl-259 connector to the antenna wire?
    As in can I just get an antenna and wire and run it before i decide on a specific radio?
     
    SJBrown likes this.
  20. Feb 16, 2021 at 10:43 AM
    #20
    Doc62

    Doc62 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2020
    Member:
    #346138
    Messages:
    612
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dave
    SE Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    2021 Tacoma TRD Off Road, 2019 Sahara
    Most mobile radios do.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top